Are there differences in reliability between thumb drives?
Are there differences in reliability between thumb drives?
I lost my flash drive and need a new one. Transfer speeds don’t matter too much. I will mainly use it to create bootable media and to transfer a few files between computers and/or phones (no cloud storage for me).
Now I’m questioning whether I should get the cheapest drive I can find or if there really is a difference in quality between €8 and €30. What experience did you make?
You're viewing a single thread.
There are definitely differences between thumbdrives.
First of all, on Amazon, ebay and the like there are flat out fake drives. You can recognize those by the extremely high capacity and low price. They will pretend to have high capacity, but then they'll just throw away your data. To test if you've fallen victim to one of these, copy a very big file (e.g. a movie) onto the drive, remove the drive, reinsert it, and then try to use the file. If that doesn't work, your drive was fake. Amazon will refund you of that happens, I dont know about ebay and others.
Any name brand will be good enough quality for home use. If you intend to use the drive for backups, spend a bit extra. If you intend to use the drive for just moving files around, feel free to cheap out.
Some drives offer extra security features such as fingerprint scanners. Those are not worth your money.
Extra rugged drives may be worth it to you, but if you're careful, you won't need that. I have not found waterproof drives to have extra value, but that depends a lot on how you'll treat the drive.
In general, you can't go wrong with SanDisk of Kingston. There are several other good brands, but I don't want to make this list too long.