More👏Alt👏Women👏War👏Criminals👏
More👏Alt👏Women👏War👏Criminals👏
64 comments
-
I might be out of the loop. Can anyone explain the war criminal part to me?
-
The article that ClathrateG sent describes a drone attack Ukraine did on an airbase which had MILITARY aircraft and shells. What they (edit: they = Ukrainians) did not know was that Russia also was hidding nuclear shells which exploded, which led to the attack doing more damage and unintentionally hurting civilians.
Most likely has nothing to do with that specific woman. Maybe just anti-hair color ragebait? Some are saying Ukrainian soldiers are war criminals for this, probably didn't hear how Russians are INTENTIONALLY bombing hospitals. Of course just saying "the other guys are worse" is problematic, but I repeat Ukrainian soldiers did not try to hurt civilians.
Here is a video about it: https://youtu.be/OODJsg6AyQg
-
What does this have to do with ALT women?
-
"Most likely has nothing to do with that woman" - Probably doesn't have anything to do with alt women, just ragebait.
-
Thank you
-
-
-
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
-
Ukrainian soldiers did not try to hurt civilians.
Perhaps not in that specific strike, but I hope you aren't minimizing the civilian deaths caused by Ukraine over the last decade of conflict. If so, there are a lot of people in Luhansk and Donetsk who would disagree if they hadn't been on the wrong end of Ukrainian artillery.
-
Unlike Russia, Ukraine mostly only targets military facilities. Of course there could be civilian casualties, like maybe in the oil refineries they bombed inside Russia, but they DON'T target civilians, but the strategic positions which may have civilians. Meanwhile Russia DOES target civilians in hospitals and schools.
I admit there are probably civilian casualties caused by Ukraine, but its an ant. Now lets address the elephant in the room: Russian caused civilian casualties and war crimes.
-
-
I am surprised you haven't heard of it, for I constantly see people talking about it.
Well here is the FBI talking about the war crimes Russia has done: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/international-human-rights-unit/russian-war-crimes-in-ukraine
It doesn't say much, but the title explicitly says Russian war crimes. Though the article does not explain what war crimes Russia has committed, I chose the FBI's government website so that you don't imply its an untrusted source. Of course there are many other sources that cover this, since you can just google it (or Firefox it since we are in the fediverse) and there will be thousands of evidence, but you are just to lazy to research yourself.
-
I don't think anyone on the anglonet has any room to condemn any other nation.
Russian crimes do not excuse Ukraine's. This is whataboutism.
-
Yes I already addressed this, if you read my previous comments: 'Of course just saying "the other guys are worse" is problematic, but I repeat Ukrainian soldiers did not try to hurt civilians.'
What I am saying is not simply that Russia killed more civilians so Ukraine is ok. I am saying that Ukrainian's attacks are fundamentally different since they target strategic positions (which may or may not have civilians) rather than targeting civilian infrastructure. Ukrainian attacks are accepted by NATO and does not violate any international laws. In fact a lot of Ukrainian soldiers were trained by NATO countries and follow their rules and standards.
-
Ukrainian soldiers were trained by NATO countries and follow their rules and standards.
Lol, imagine thinking NATO doesn't commit war crimes lol
Ukraine systemically and deliberately shelled civilians for years. Your ignorance of the facts doesn't erase them.
Imagine thinking you can tell a literal tankie something about a conflict they have been following for a fucking decade lol.
Edit. You don't oppose warcrimes. You only oppose whatever you can call a warcrime committed by the other team. And again, an American (I assume) with the blood of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians on their hands has no room to moralize.
-
NATO basically dictates what is considered a war crime and dictates international laws and trains their military accordingly. It is the most ethical military there is. Of course it may not be perfect, but its the best we've got.
I guess you have your own definition of war crimes and international laws that is better than NATO which is a literal tankie that studies war and international laws.
Ukraine does not target civilians, if you ask anyone aside from the kremlin of course. (Are you getting your information from the kremlin?) 🧐
-
Never trust anyone that says their army is the most moral.
Your comment comes down too, "as the soul arbiters of what is moral we have investigated ourselves on found ourselves to be the most moral." It's circular logic.
Imagine thinking in English speaker on the western internet isn't already familiar with the liberal propaganda surrounding this war lol
Imagine claiming NATO is The most moral military force on the planet, right after this administration bragged about killing 60 innocent people in an apartment building to target one man in Ansarallah's missile program on a group chat.
-
-
-
- whataboutism
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce8y655p52do
Three men have been killed in the Moscow region, in what is described as the largest drone attack on the Russian capital since the start of the full-scale war in Ukraine.
A further 18 people, including three children, were injured, health officials told Russian media.
Officials said all three men who died had been working at a distribution centre when it was hit by drone debris in the village of Yam, near Domodedovo airport. Dozens of vehicles were destroyed when the drone hit a car park, and the glass front of a supermarket was badly damaged.
Children and supermarkets aren't legitimate military targets, for a single example, another https://en.topwar.ru/207174-gde-i-kogda-russkij-soldat-s-izvestnogo-video-otrazhal-ataki-ukrainskogo-drona-.html from geneva convention Article 41 - Safeguard of an enemy hors de combat
many other examples can be found
the I think the title is perhaps a reference to this classic
-
Explanation: this is an instance full of russian misinformation agents and a couple tankies. Stay away.
-
Everyone that makes fun of ukrainian fascists must be a Russian. Good god go back to reddit dweeb.
Signed, an anarchist.
Edit: also can we please make that comment a new site tagline that rules
-
Ukrainians keep recording and posting videos of themselves committing war crimes but I guess they're just Russian agents
-
It's okay to kill Russian civilians with no other purpose than spreading terror because Russians aren't humans! Not a war crime! Checkmate tankies!
-
Russian civilians
Don't you mean Orcs, or Ruzzians, or the worst of all I have heard is Z****rs
CW: Extreme racism
-
Jesus fucking Christ I had no idea they were using slurs by mixing anything with the n slur with a hard r, fuck these disgusting nazi scum all the way to hell.
-
Can't keep us out of their minds even when we have nothing to do with it. Keyboard warriors and soon will be paste for the meat grinder
-
-
-
The BBC are Russian Hamas combatants.
-
-
-
Don’t listen to all the liberals denying our true nature. Of course we are a bunch of
and I’m tired of pretending we are not -
Spooky theremin music -
I love when libs say stuff like this because it's a sure bet that I can discount everything that comes out of their mouths. If they're wrong about me being a Russian agent, why should I believe them about anything else?
-
Speak for yourself, I am one reposted state department press release from abandoning years of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist thought and becoming a neoliberal.
-
-
-
Excuse me I'll have you know the MSS agents here work at least 3x as hard and only get .5 xi bucks per post.
-
-
64 comments