1d ago

Which are (some of) your favourites GM-tips/technique ? And how do you use-them in your games ?

Many of us, have read GM-sections in RPG, RPG blogs, forum discussions, and sometimes books about the storytelling art.

All of these contains tons of interesting tips/techniques (and some will contradict each other, you don't GM a gritty mega-dungeon and high-school drama game the same way), so I am curious which ones are your favourite and how do you use them in your game

You're viewing a single thread.

27 comments

The players won't care about how pretty you make your maps. Make them functional and ugly, and you'll save up so much time for other prep.
- Also make maps that people in universe would use, not a god or modern satellite images. Romans used maps that showed main roads and villages, why would a random adventurer need a super detailed map with borders on it.
- • I refer to this as the 'Video Game Rule'. In the last thirty years the visual aspects of the hobby have become more important because we’re think we are ‘competing’ with video games. Once we realize we are making a different kind of experience it allows the story (that is the narrative elements) to outshine the graphics, if you will.-
- Indeed, that's a huge one.
  Remember before streaming and VTT? You would do sketch on a white board and be happy. Some committed GM may have had a white board with a grid and copy the map from the scenario on it.
  Nice textures are nice on video games, but not on rpg
- I found a map-making site that is, let's be honest, shit. The maps it makes can only ever be "good enough", and never great. This means I don't waste time trying to make them great, and can actually finish the dang things. Plus, if the players decide not to go to the noble manor, then it's no big loss.
  This idea goes for a lot of the game, actually. If you spend less time on the story, then it's no big loss if the plot takes a tangent. And they probably weren't going to be as invested in a forced narrative as they would be for something more organic.
  
  When I first started DMing as a kid, my dad told me the best thing I could do to prepare was just know the whole world. He then told me about an adventure he was running where the players, for literally no reason, started digging in the middle of a tunnel. There was a whole dungeon set up for them ready to explore, and they went 50' into the tunnel and started digging their own tunnel.
  
  I think better advice in that situation is to find players who want to play the game you're running. It might be fun to make a tunnel-exploration campaign, but I'm running that dungeon over there. We'll do the tunnel thing another time.
  Also, to rephrase your dad's advice, know enough of the world to be able to add shit where you need to. I don't even know if the world is round, but I don't need to. If the players are in a church, I'll make sure to know the popular religions in case I need to roleplay as a priest.
  
  I don’t even know if the world is round, but I don’t need to.
  The players will find a way to make you need to.
  
  No, the world is enormous and you only need to worry about a small part of it. There is literally nothing over there, and no reason you'd want to go there. The game is over here. Leaving this area is the same as leaving the game, which you are free to do.

27 comments