The Giant Mine just outside of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada is one of the country's largest recognized environmental liabilities. The mine's 100 plus year history illustrates the continuity between resource colonialism in the late 19th/early 20th century and neoliberalism at the turn of the millennium.
There were several gold rushes in northern Canada/US in the late 19th century, such as the Klondike. The Giant gold strike on was first discovered by settlers about the same time as the Klondike, but as Giant is on Great Slave Lake (named for an Anglicization of the name of local peoples, not after slavery) instead of the Pacific Ocean, it is much less accessible and didn't take off like the Klondike. Parallel with displacement of local Yellowknives Dene people https://ykdene.com/, the town of Yellowknife sprung up around small mining operations through the 30s. It wasn't until after WW2 that the mine was developed at a large scale. Starting operation in 1948, Giant was owned by a Canadian mining conglomerate through the 80s, then some Australians, and for the last ten years of its operating life, by Americans, who went bankrupt and abandoned the property in 1999. The Canadian federal government is responsible for the site and its remediation now, similar to the way the EPA has Superfund sites in the USA.
The project is infamous for poisoning the people and environment of the surrounding area through arsenic poisoning. The ore at giant is arsenopyrite, an arsenic sulphide mineral that often contains gold. Roasting it in large furnaces or kilns releases the gold as well as fine arsenic trioxide dust. The most infamous arsenic poisoning incident was in 1951 when a Yellowknives Dene toddler in died after eating contaminated snow in the fallout area, 2 kilometers from the processing mill's smokestack. Over the years, improvements to the mill reduced the amount of toxic dust released to the environment. This is better than blasting it into the air wildly, but meant that the site accumulated hundreds of thousands of tonnes of arsenic trioxide dust that they chucked in empty mine workings underground. Unfortunately, arsenic trioxide dissolves in water as easily as sugar and so represents a tremendous risk to groundwater and waterbodies nearby, like Great Slave Lake and Yellowknife's water supply.
Arsenic issues contributed to labour disputes as well. In 1991 the union workers of the plant went on strike, refusing management's demand to reduce their salary and wanting better safety measures for workers . The company brought in Pinkertons and strikebreakers, backed by RCMP thugs. The situation escalated, culminating in a bomb planted on a train track deep in the mine. When it was triggered, it killed 6 scabs and 3 Pinkertons. For the next year, the RCMP interrogated mine workers, their family and community without determining who did it, supporting the company in their refusal to sign a new contract until an arrest was made. Finally a worker named Roger Warren confessed to doing it alone and was sentenced to life in prison. He was released in 2014 and died in 2017.
Since 1999, the site has been the responsibility of the Canadian federal government and is being every so gradually remediated. Operated through what are effectively private-public partnership contracts, environmental engineering companies are attempting to clean up and isolate the huge amounts of arsenic trioxide dust. The concept is move the dust into specially ventilated chambers of the underground mine, where it is frozen in place and thus prevented from leaching into groundwater. Active remediation is supposed to be finished in about 15 years at a cost of $1 billion CAD, but will surely take longer and cost more than this. Also, freezing material in place will definitely work because the climate isn't changing, and the Canadian north is definitely not seeing extreme levels of temperature rise.
After active works are complete, the site will require perpetual care.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis. Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
I'm a bit baffled that the annual figure only has a datapoint every two years. especially because of covid, a little more resolution might shed a lot of light on the trends
but I'm not surprised. I've been driving in some capacity for quite a while and I don't think the roads have ever been quite this bad and full of complete lunatics, often in vehicles that should be illegal like the one in the pic. In my area, 2023 and 2024 really saw the full force return of traffic congestion, but the dangerous driving habits picked up during the pandemic didn't go away, at least that's my pet theory
Edit: there was a drop in 2023, but still well above even 2020 levels, still in early 80s territory
I could probably write a book about my theories on why driving has gotten so bad. I know that people owning monster trucks for personal use is definitely a contributor, but there has been a dramatic increase in reckless and aggressive driving since the pandemic began.
Everyone is (on average) more angry than they used to be, and since people tend to disconnect while driving, it's an easy way to express anger against others who you will likely never have to see or interact with again. Driving interactions are as close as you can get to the internet while still being real-life.
US roads were built like in the 1950s and it is lacking maintenance already, poor conditions leads to more accidents.
The population growth pushing people away from jobs to the suburbs means even more people driving. I found this
US driving schools and what it takes to get a license is incredibly behind the standards of almost every other country? Its extremely obvious the auto industry wants no restrictions.
Then yeah you can add the modern psychological pressures of work culture expectations, more assholes in general, more stress, less healthy eating and sleep before driving etc.
I also wouldn't be surprised if there were a general decrease in the availability an accessibility of public transportation.
Like, a form of public transportation I rarely see discussed is school busses. When I was a kid, most of us rode buses, and there'd be a route right outside your house unless you lived down at the end of a rural dead-end road or something. Either way you'd just have a short walk, or your parents could drop you off at the stop on their way to work wherever they were headed. And it was always, always free. Now the bus routes are few and far between, many kids have to traverse a deadly obstacle course to get to one, many schools have you pay an extra fee to get bus services, and the number of cars converging on schools at the beginning and end of the school day is ENORMOUS.
I've also read speculation on neoliberalism (individualism) impacting this.
Prior to our hyper-individualized times people had more awareness on behaving according to collective norms and in taking others needs into consideration also in traffic behaviour. Our me first-style atomized existance likely produces this behaviour.
I think it makes sense in a system like traffic that breaks down when people stop caring or even noticing other people.
In my area (of NorCal), COVID decreased traffic for about two weeks. Then everything returned to pretty much normal levels of insanity. Barely a fucking blip.
Most of the fatality growth has been at night - so SUVs (and increase in car mass generally), poor infrastructure and increased number of people walking around. Phone usage for both drivers and pedestrians.
Yeah, even the best phones in 2010 were pieces of shit compared to what we have now. I'd blame the vast majority of that increase on smart phones and the internet (with the entirety of the underlying blame being on cars and car infrastructure obviously).
While the size is a contributing factor the main factor is widespread decreases in traffic enforcement by cops. Across the us police and hand out way less tickets for speeding running red lights and things of that nature. Lazy bums
Policing has never really been much of a deterrent anyway. To get people to drive safer, you really have to engineer the actual, material conditions to make driving slower and paying more attention a necessity. Like, you have to make negligent driving as dangerous to the driver as to the pedestrians and cyclists and shit they may hit. This means narrow lanes, bollards, etc. And it means making the other participants safer through actual physical protection. Don't make pedestrians and cyclists "share the road" with the murder mobiles, but give them their own space.
And huge vehicles is part of this problem. Contrary to popular belief, it doesn't necessarily make the driver/passengers safer*, but it DOES make you more dangerous to everyone else on the road. So that calculus of whether you are putting yourself in as much danger as you are putting other people in still shifts when you introduce and multiply the urban tanks.
Anyway, traffic (non-)engineering has increased the number of "stroads" and outdoor-shopping-malls-and-parking-lot zones over time, on top of ever-increasing vehicle size. On the major street nearest my house, they decided that the number of accidents meant they should put in a center turn lane for people to aim for and loiter in. But far from making things safer, it just means you have more lanes to worry about traffic being in (one of them from both directions!), merging into, and turning out of as you pull out or try to cross a driveway on foot or whatever. And having so much more apparent room due to the turn lane, people of course drive faster! Fucking brilliant!
* Back in the decades of land-boat-style station wagons and stuff, they started putting weights in the doors of cars, because feeling the heft and solid slam of the door made people feel like they were safer in them. But they were literally just bulk weight, rather than any kind of actual structural enhancement. Great stuff!
Findings indicate an association between acute COVID-19 rates and increased car crashes with an OR of 1.5 (1.23-1.26 95%CI). The analysis did not find a protective effect of vaccination against increased crash risks, contrary to previous assumptions. The OR of car crashes associated with COVID-19 was comparable to driving under the influence of alcohol at legal limits or driving with a seizure disorder.
In addition to reasons already mentioned (phones, big cars, COVID), I wouldn't be surprised if the aging population was a factor. There are way more old people now than there were in 2010 and that means worse vision and reflexes. Modern cars also offer less visibility which makes it harder to be aware of your surroundings even for good drivers.
We really need slower streets and smaller vehicles as well as public transit. I also don't like how EVs are marketed largely for being super-fast. They accelerate way too quickly and reckless drivers love flooring it from stop lights