Technology @lemmy.world simple @lemm.ee 4 mo. ago

Firefox CTO Responds On Collecting User Advertisement Data

libreddit.bus-hit.me A Word About Private Attribution in Firefox - r/firefox

View on Redlib, an alternative private front-end to Reddit.

Reddit link: https://reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1e43w7v/a_word_about_private_attribution_in_firefox/

You're viewing a single thread.

72 comments

Rather than fighting against ad-tech , they're caving. If someone comes into your house to punch you and rob you everyday, do you say "let's find a solution that we're both happy with, how about you rob me and don't punch me?"

We could have argued about how privacy-protecting this is, and whether it will actually prevent further intrusive tracking. Perhaps I might be persuaded to keep it. But the fact that I wasn't informed about being opted in when upgrading, and the fact that the CTO is doubling down on "users are too stupid to understand this", means they've lost any trust and/or willingness for me to listen to them. Turning this off for good.
- If someone comes into your house to punch you and rob you everyday, do you say "let's find a solution that we're both happy with, how about you rob me and don't punch me?"
  
  I this economy? Of course not! I'd ask them to stop robbing me and keep punching me.
  
  That's how you get Edge tbh
  
  I think with Edge you get punched, robbed and then raped for good measure.
- I don’t get all the fervor against ads. People are talking about kicking them out as if it’s so much more ethical than piracy. What they do is surround your house with billboards; of course you negotiate in that scenario
  
  If you're the one paying for internet access, you should also have the right to determine the content that you're paying to have access to. While something like pi hole could be used to metaphorically take down most of the billboards without impacting the ground below it, even everyday users should be informed about the data advertisers are getting from them, whether it is anonymized or not. Hiding an important setting about data sharing near the bottom of a page in settings doesn't help anyone but the advertisers.
  
  I agree that it would probably be much better if the setting was set by a pop-up instead (as they say, most users would treat it like a cookie banner anyway), though I still think it’s as morally reprehensible as piracy. If you think one of these aren’t fine, you probably should think the other isn’t either. Like you paid for the TV but the TV doesn’t pay for the cable package; blocking ads removes their revenue.
  
  I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but don't you also pay for cable. If I'm paying for a service I don't want ads also served to me using it.
  
  Cable tv also has ads, though
  
  They had the same amount as modern subscriptions back when cable was as new as the Internet is today
  
  If you’re paying for the cable package, yeah. But then you also have the free local channels. Most sites don’t require you to pay for them.
  
  Gross

You've viewed 72 comments.