7mo ago

Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat | PC Gamer

www.pcgamer.com Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat

The Las Vegas Sphere might have an impressive spec sheet, but its energy demands are almost as staggering.

Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat

Ghazi @lemmy.blahaj.zone

squirrel @lemmy.blahaj.zone

7mo ago

Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat

www.pcgamer.com /hardware/las-vegas-dystopia-sphere-powered-by-150-nvidia-gpus-and-drawing-up-to-28000000-watts-is-both-a-testament-to-the-hubris-of-humanity-and-an-admittedly-impressive-technical-feat/

86 16

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context

434 comments

And there’s crime so you might as well rape
the claim is that by not consuming factory farmed meat, you make an impact on the amount of emissions from its production. this is not true. it is also not analogous to raping anyone.
- You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don't give them money for their product? If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.
  Analogies don't indicate a similar level of morality. They are used to explain points to people who, for some reason, are unwilling or unable to otherwise understand.
  
  Analogies don’t indicate a similar level of morality.
  i didnt suggest they did. i'm saying that buying food is disanalagous to rape.
  edit
  to be clear, rape is wrong. buying food is not. you don't not-rape in order to reduce rape. you don't-rape because rape is wrong. by contrast, the goal of not-buying meat is to reduce the environmental impact of the meat industry. if that doesn't work, then not-buying meat is not a moral duty (at least, not for that reason. it's possible there is some other reason, but that's not the topic being discussed).
  
  What if you buy food from someone you know murdered children to get it? It's so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act. If you are interested in having philosophical conversations, then you really need to go back to the basics. At this point, you're trying to join an archery competition with a nurf toy. There are undeniably immoral ways to get food. Destroying the planet and torturing animals for slightly cheaper food that you do not absolutely need to survive is absolutely immoral. The reason it is so hard for you to see this is because you are an addict making excuses. Not because you are starving and need the cheapest, most despicable food.
  
  It’s so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act.
  I allowed that there may be some reason buying some food might be immoral.
  
  That's progress! You're on a good track. Not sure if you're the same one I sent this link to or not, but if you want to see the living conditions of the animals in the meat system are, here you go. You can judge the morality of it on your own.
  https://youtu.be/LQRAfJyEsko
  
  you should give it trigger warning before your link gore
  
  this YouTube video sucks
  
  why is the bar "absolute need for survival"?
  
  Because if not, then you are putting your own mere 20 minutes of pleasure higher than entire lives of tight, confined, indoor, away from their children and parents, raped, drugged, mutilated while alive of animals. There is no chance that if an animal was living like this on your property such that you had to see it daily, you wouldn't save it. As it is, nearly everyone happily hires billionaires to do it for them. Most of the time they hide behind "but I neeeeeed foooood!!!". I've not given those scumbags a penny in many years, and I'm alive, I'm not rich, and I am absolutely well nourished. I've recently done multiple marathons.
  
  ou are putting your own mere 20 minutes of pleasure higher than entire lives
  the animal is dead long before i decide what to eat. my decision is not a value judgement on their lives.
  
  The fact that you habitually pay people to do that animals is what causes them to do this to future animals. You understand this. It tells something that your best defense is this to excuse your actions.
  
  people have free will, and so their choices cannot be said to be caused by anything other than their will. I am not responsible for what people in the meat industry do.
  
  If someone pays someone else $1,000,000 to kill their ex-girlfriend, is only the murderer morally responsible?
  
  No analogous relationship between the purchaser and the slaughterhouse worker exists.
  
  I thought we were discussing ecological impacts. this seems to be an entirely different r discussion.
  
  The factory farming industry has very significant ecological impacts. In addition to the extreme suffering and misery that it causes to sentient beings. It's really a lose-lose.
  
  it seems like muddying the waters. why is it so hard to focus on the effectiveness of consumer action in reducing ecological impacts? that is the topic
  
  I see the people consuming the meat and animal products as consumers. I see the impact they have on the planet as ecological impact. I don't see how this is off topic.
  
  early everyone happily hires billionaires to do it for them.
  no one hires billionaires.
  
  You pay someone to do something for you. Whether this is hiring or paying someone for a service is just semantics. There is an obvious reason why this sort of petty rebuttal is all you are able to use as a response.
  
  this is all posturing and rhetoric. there is nothing of substance to rebutt here.
  
  no one is torturing animals
  
  Guess again. Almost certainly, you are contributing a significant portion of your energy and money to billionaires who torture animals in ways that you would be unable to even watch.
  https://youtu.be/LQRAfJyEsko
  I've been wrong plenty before, but I would be astonished if you are capable of even viewing the atrocities that you commit. That's how disgusting the things people hire billionaires to do in the name of cheap meat it.
  
  this YouTube video sucks
  
  Yeah. It does suck to see what the average person chooses to spend their life paying people to do to animals. It especially sucks if you are one of the people paying them to do it.
  
  no. I meant that video is long and poorly made. it sucks.
  
  you should give it trigger warning before you link gore
  
  This is what most people are paying to have happen every day.
  
  no, they're not. this YouTube video does not show standard practices even in mid 2010s in Australia where it was filmed
  
  Try and find out the standard practices of the factory farm where the meat from your local area comes from. They don't make it easy to find out, and if you do find out, it is currently much worse than what was happening 15 years ago. There is a good reason for this, too. In most regards, the rule is that they can't be too much worse than the average behavior. This is causing a horrific drift to worse and worse practices.
  There is almost no push back on this because the average person is so reluctant to admit that they may be supporting something so vile that they stand behind whatever it is these farms do without having any actual idea of what's going on. Nobody is checking in on these places and coming out saying alls good other than the people making a ton of money off them.
  If you don't know for sure that you get animal products from good places, then it is almost guaranteed that you don't. If you don't care to even find out, then you are the normal consumer, and you have accepted that your pleasure matters more than the treatment of the animals in them. You are not the minority. You are the merciless masses with no morality in this regard.
  
  You are the merciless masses with no morality in this regard.
  you have no idea what my morality is
  
  you have accepted that your pleasure matters more than the treatment of the animals in them.
  I don't believe this, but it's clear you do. yet you don't seem to want to accept it. I offer a solution: mind your own business.
  
  I would be astonished if you are capable of even viewing the atrocities that you commit.
  i am not in your youtube video at all. don't lie.
  
  You hire these people because you are too ashamed or disgusted to do it yourself, that's why you can't ven view what you pay people to do.
  
  I didn't hire any of those people
  
  you accusation of addiction is a personal attack. it has no bearing on the truth of any of the claims I've made.
  
  It absolutely does. You would be able to see it if the addiction in question was cheap animal products. Your brain is clouded by the fact that since food is required to live, then no food can be an addiction. You're simply wrong. You and many people can be addicted to cheap, unhealthy food that harms the planet. As a result of it, you excise your own deplorable behavior.
  
  You’re simply wrong.
  saying it doesn't make it true.
  
  You are right about that. What makes you wrong is what you said, not what I said.
  
  saying I'm wrong doesn't make it so. I have been right this whole time
  
  Oh, you said you're right, I guess that proves it then, well played.
  
  I've presented exactly as much evidence as you, to wit.
  
  Your brain is clouded
  are you a psychologist? are you my psychologist? frankly, you are acting irresponsibly and you should consider staying in your own expertise.
  
  It doesn't take any specialty to see this. That's how obvious it is. When someone is deluding themselves to this extent, it is easy to see from the outside. Spend some time with someone who is addicted to things that you are not, and you will see.
  
  you should stop practicing medicine before your local board finds you.
  
  If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.
  this is a thought terminating cliche
  
  You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don’t give them money for their product?
  have you tried that?
  
  Yes, I have. The millions of us who choose not to help those assholes causes them to make less e missions. Unfortunately there are still people like you who live without caring about anyone but their own immediate gratification.
  
  causes them to make less e missions.
  that has never happened
  
  you think that factory farms that sell 1 ton of meat make the exact same emission as factory farms that sell 1,000 tons of meat
  no one said that. what i said is that emissions from agriculture have always risen, so it can't be that anything you've done has decreased them.
  
  If you don't give bezos money every month, then he has less money than if you did give him money every month. This doesn't mean that you not giving him money makes him poorer, but he has less money than he would have if you had given him money. This isn't tough to understand, I know I grasp it.
  
  If you don’t give bezos money every month, then he has less money than if you did give him money every month
  in one hypothetical versus another, sure. but in the real worlds, we can't prove a counterfactual. you can't prove whether, if I had given him money, if he'd have ended up poorer anyway.
  
  Yes, I have. The millions of us who choose not to help those assholes cause them to make less emissions. Unfortunately, there are still people like you who live without caring about anyone but their own immediate gratification.

434 comments