The debate gets interesting sometimes
The debate gets interesting sometimes
429 comments
-
It is well known that a number of states sow division in the populace of their enemies to weaken them. Does polarizing hot button issues do that? History says it does.
Does Palestine matter to them? No. Does polarizing the populace of the enemy matter to them? Yes. Are either of the organizations linked above tools of states that would like to harm America? I don't know. Could they, or similar organizations be used that way? Sure.
-
So every Pro-Palestinian group is a psyop, got it.
Where are you obtaining your information on the genocide?
-
Sorry, your lack of reading comprehension has no bearing on the facts of what I said.
-
Which part of the statement sounds like it may be a psyop?
https://www.aaiusa.org/library/template-for-the-blog-library-and-latest-inforesources-4fa7n-mhtwy
Which pro-Palestinian group do you find most reputable?
-
I made no statements one way or the other on whether this organization, or any other Palestinian organization was a psy op. Moreover, I specifically said I don't know. What I did say was that promoting a polarizing topic could sow division in a group, making it a viable option for a psy op.
-
You know what's worse than telling people there's a genocide?
Doing a genocide.
-
Know what's bigger than one?
Two.
-
Two is possibly a psyop. I'm not calling it a psyop, just saying it might be.
-
Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
-
I understood that reference! (☞ﾟヮﾟ)
-
Someone else didn't.
-
-
I agree, it's why I don't cast doubt on genocide victims.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
429 comments