Chad, a country in north-central Africa, borders a lot of active geopolitical areas - Niger to the West, Libya to the North, Sudan to the East - but is scarcely discussed itself. I'm not really knowledgable enough to give anything like a decent history, but the recent gist is that the country was ruled for three decades by Idriss Déby until he was killed in battle in 2021 while fighting northern rebels. Idriss was part of a few wars - such as the one against Gaddafi in Libya, and also the Second Congo War. While he was initially elected democratically in 1996 and 2001, he then eliminated term limits and just kept on going.
After his death, Chad has been ruled by his son, Mahamat Idriss Déby. In early May 2024, elections began which were meant to result in the transition from a military-ruled goverment to a civilian-ruled one. Needless to say, Mahamat won the election - with 61% of the vote. Both father and son have been on the side of the French and the US, whereas the opposition is against foreign colonizers and has attempted to put pressure on the government in numerous ways to achieve a more substantial independence. France maintains a troop presence in Chad, and it's something of a stronghold for them - when French troops were forced out of Niger, they retreated to Chad. However, it's not clear even to the people inside Chad what precisely the French are doing there. I mean, we know what their presence is really for - imperialism and election rigging - but in an official sense, they don't seem to be doing much to help the country materially. What is clear is that they like to intervene on behalf of the ruling regime and against rebels a whole lot - the most interventions by France in any African country, in fact.
The United States, so keen on human rights and democracy in so many places around the world like Russia, Iran, and China, have - for some strange reason! - decided for the last 30 years that they can live with a couple dictators and wars in the case of Chad. In fact, various American state propaganda firms like the ISW and Washington Post have warned the current government about the Wagner Group interfering with the country and spreading anti-Western sentiments as in the rest of the Sahel.
Things are very tough for Chad. They are among the poorest countries in Africa and host about one million people fleeing from nearby conflicts, which is a pretty large number when Chad has a population of about 17 million.
With the French Empire fading, they are beginning to run out of places to retreat to in Africa. Macron, in January, said that his defense council had decided to reduce troop presence in Gabon, Senegal, and the Côte d'Ivoire, though has maintained troop levels in Chad and Djibouti. Meanwhile, on the other side of the planet from France, anti-empire sentiments are boiling to the surface in New Caledonia/Kanaky, which is unfortunate for the French military as they really need that island, both for the massive nickel reserves, but also as an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Pacific just in case a conflict with China pops off.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Chad! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi discussed Red Sea tensions with Yemeni Foreign Minister Shayea Mohsen Al-Zindani in Beijing on Tuesday, saying they're a spillover effect of the ongoing Gaza conflict and China is willing to play a constructive role in solving the crisis.
Al-Zindani is in Beijing to attend the 10th Ministerial Conference of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum which will be held on Thursday. Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, said the current priority is to stop the conflict in Gaza as soon as possible to avoid a greater humanitarian disaster.
He urged the international community to make greater efforts to implement the "two-state solution," and called on the relevant parties to stop harassing civilian ships and maintain the safety of waterways in the Red Sea. Wang added that China is willing to continue playing a constructive role in this regard. He also stated China hopes that all parties concerned can stick to the political settlement and actively respond to the mediation efforts of the United Nations and regional countries.
Al-Zindani expressed appreciation for China's support for Yemen's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, and China's long-term assistance to Yemen's economic and social development without attaching any political conditions. He added that Yemen looks forward to China playing a greater role in promoting the de-escalation of the situation in the Red Sea as well as the reconciliation and reconstruction of Yemen. Yemen believes that the 10th meeting will push China-Arab cooperation to a new level, said Al-Zindani.
In this context, it just sounds like they're doing the standard Chinese thing of "uh well I mean we want international rules to be obeyed, missiles firing at ships isn't ideal, so if eventually everybody could come to an agreement once the Gaza issue has been settled, that would be cool and nice" which makes a lot of sense if their entire multipolar vision is a genuine application of the UN Charter. it's hard to be in support of that and then turn around and say "oh yeah, and firing at cargo ships going through straits is cool and based" especially given China's geographical position.
it's not "YEMEN, WE ARE TIRED OF THIS. STOP THE BLOCKADE NOW OR ELSE." The Yemeni FM sounds pretty okay with it based on what they said in the article.
Was just about to post this. It's always important for people to always investigate deeper past surface impressions such as journalist click bait titles
Yeah we need to remind everyone to stop posting twitter screenshots. If you see something on twitter do a little digging to find a better source with more information before posting.
You also need to be very careful when reading diplomatic language. Most countries, and especially China, do not engage in bombastic diplomatic language. Understanding how to read it is a bit like understanding that a US southerner saying "bless your heart" is actually kinda condescending even though it sounds nice.
Yeah every major conflict China has pretty much just said “We urge (party attacking) to respect the sovereignty of (party defending), minimize civilian casualties, and prioritize a peaceful, diplomatic solution” regardless of how they feel
More importantly, is Al-Zindani even a member of Ansarallah? If he's part of the internationally recognized government that nominally rules Yemen, then this is a nothingburger. So the Chinese FM just met some useless dude representing a government that has jurisdiction over their hotel room in Qatar. I was going to say that the real L is for China to bother entertaining the internationally recognized Yemeni government that holds no de facto power, but it seems like it's just him meeting with the FM at some forum in Beijing, so China didn't like waste jet fuel flying to Qatar or even arrange the meeting specifically for him.
Not malfunction? I think we all just overreacted to 2022 and their support for Russia, thinking that China has a mature understanding of anti-imperialism and that they were willing to at least put weight behind their words.
What happened since then was a complete rejection, straight to our face, multiple times where they repeatedly tell us they don't want conflict, they don't want a new bloc, they don't want a cold war etc... They praise Kissinger, they make silly gestures at Taiwan while the US calls their bluff every single time, they say the half correct even thing about Gaza while we should just ignore its over 6 months and not a single sanction or any diplomatic move against Israel. They meet with Biden and cheer, they meet with Yellen, Blinken. They make angry faces and noises but also turn around and welcome the demons into their home. Its all a clown joke if you want any sort of communist world view behind these actions.
And that is not barely half of it, at this point its like believing lightning strikes the same place 5 times or something.
If true then the US will eventually eat their lunch, sooner AND later
I've always known China has suffered from the severe issue of westernized university-educated Chinese liberals who believe in all the humbugs of neoclassical economics and apply that tainted worldview when they reach high offices
Obviously the inability to see the world and the US for what they truly are leads to this manifestation of Chinese liberal oscillating and fence sitting on issues that are fundamentally existential for the future of China