Bulletins and News Discussion from May 6th to May 12th, 2024 - The Nagorno-Karabakh Nosedive - COTW: Armenia
Image is of Stepanakert, essentially the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. It is now a ghost city, and Azerbaijan has recently torn down the parliament building and various other important places. Sourced from this article.
A quick look at Armenia's geographical position reveals the folly of trying to create some kind of Western outpost. With a hostile Azerbaijan to their east, a very unfriendly (albeit NATO member) Turkiye to their west, an ascendant Iran to their south, and Russia not far from the action, there is little hope of doing much more than causing a little chaos in the hopes it'll momentarily distract Russia while it makes inroads most everywhere else on the planet. The political situation appears miserable for Pashinyan, but there isn't really a popular alternative to take the reins. A truly cursed situation.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Armenia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Someone posted a video about boycotting Eurovision on /r/BreadTube. The video is full of "why won't they ban Israel when they RIGHTFULLY banned Russia?!" and "people RIGHTFULLY booed Russia" and shit (will have to watch out for Brigitte Empire, who I thought was better than that). I was just going to remove it, but I thought I'd test out whether people have progressed on their view of Russia and Ukraine. So I commented with what should honestly be extremely obvious stuff to any leftist and a good number of progressive liberals who have escaped the worst of the foreign policy propaganda:
If anyone should have been banned for the war in Ukraine, it is Ukraine. Non-stop war crimes against the people in Donbass for almost a decade is pretty close to the Israel/Palestine situation, in fact...at least the slower burn of that genocide prior to Oct 7, in any case. Or, of course, the U.S. which precipitated and enabled the whole thing...but I take it the U.S. doesn't participate anyway.
Or, if you want to go so far as banning countries that generally participate in invasions and war crimes and colonialism and sometimes historically even genocide, Eurovision is going to be a pretty lonely place. If you ban Russia, then you'd damned well better ban the UK, Denmark, France, Spain, Australia (whose genocide is still going, even, much like the U.S.'s), etc. if you want to avoid being an absolute hypocrite. (I'm all for it, but I don't see it happening.)
Anyway, yeah: there's not much reason not to ban Israel from absolutely everything at this point. BDS the fuck out of it. Take Ansar Allah's lead and go further than just halting your own economic activities, even. And absolutely boycott things like Eurovision when they won't.
If the participants wanted to divest themselves from the genocide and actively denounce Israel while they participate, I could see an exception being made. But, of course, they'd never be welcome home without handcuffs, so someone had better be willing to offer them asylum afterward.
Anyway, instant down-vote still, but not nearly as heavily as I expected. is incapable of seeing Western hypocrisy, even when you ban all the liberal dipshits who actually comment with their nonsense.
Idk I think your response would be more rhetorically effective if you approached from the point of view of equivocating the two countries.
Not everyone is a news mega thread nerd like anybody reading this is. I think it would be relatively easy to bring bread tube to having the pure "anti-war, both sides bad" position which would be a massive improvement vs where they are now. Then you siphon them off to here after that.