Bulletins and News Discussion from May 6th to May 12th, 2024 - The Nagorno-Karabakh Nosedive - COTW: Armenia
Image is of Stepanakert, essentially the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. It is now a ghost city, and Azerbaijan has recently torn down the parliament building and various other important places. Sourced from this article.
A quick look at Armenia's geographical position reveals the folly of trying to create some kind of Western outpost. With a hostile Azerbaijan to their east, a very unfriendly (albeit NATO member) Turkiye to their west, an ascendant Iran to their south, and Russia not far from the action, there is little hope of doing much more than causing a little chaos in the hopes it'll momentarily distract Russia while it makes inroads most everywhere else on the planet. The political situation appears miserable for Pashinyan, but there isn't really a popular alternative to take the reins. A truly cursed situation.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Armenia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
The AFL-CIO should start its own version of AAA but for non-union workers. Pay a membership fee (maybe based on income?), get access to stuff like discounted insurance, union-affiliated lawyers who can help with stuff like labor complaints, people who can help explain things like unemployment benefits/help people fill it out, etc. A lot of the services offered could overlap with services their unions already offer, meaning they could maybe consolidate some stuff and lower costs for benefits.
I had never heard of that before, but based on briefly scanning the wiki article, mostly, yes. But I also think a big focus should trying to get people to associate problems with their employer with calling this new IWO. It would be very powerful for the AFL-CIO or some other labor or leftist group to become the intermediary between workers and the US labor/legal system. We can make sure non-union workers know what their options are when their employers abuse them, and make sure they are funnelled to lawyers who actually give a shit. It's also very useful to know which non-union companies are piecea of shit, because those are targets for unionization and this group would already have the inside scoop, to some extent.
There's also just a bunch of liberals and leftists with disposable income who aren't part of a union and would love to have a little membership card to show everyone how they are part of the working class. Might as well take their money (and mine lol).
Most of what you said already existed under CPUSA prior to the Red Scare. The CIO, the IWO, funny enough not the lawyers they were mainly fellow travelers.
But all were smashed, cowled, or assimilated by the state
Isn't what you describe just being a union member without working somewhere with a union contract?
Lots of unions around the world offer stuff like cheap insurance, internet subscription or even cinema tickets to make union membership more attractive. When you approach a business with hundreds of thousands of potential customers you can negotiate better prices than if you just approach them with your potential purchase.
Isn't what you describe just being a union member without working somewhere with a union contract?
As far as I know, the only union like that in the US is the IWW. I'm not really sure how it works.
I'm not really thinking of this as a union, though. It's more like a sort of benefit society/cooperative sort of deal that sits outside of normal union laws that can serve as a funnel into the labor movement. Part of the idea is also thinking it would be a bit of a funny way to flip the Janus ruling around on the right by using the same freedom of association justifications as a way to help organize labor.