Judge rules YouTube, Facebook and Reddit must face lawsuits claiming they helped radicalize a mass shooter | CNN Business
Judge rules YouTube, Facebook and Reddit must face lawsuits claiming they helped radicalize a mass shooter | CNN Business
The wrongful death lawsuit against several social media companies for allegedly contributing to the radicalization of a gunman who killed 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, will be allowed to proceed.
You're viewing a single thread.
What is it with libs and their inability to understand what the term "radicalize" mean?
It's really simple. The white supremacist content this little alt-right child terrorist was watching wasn't radical - it was reactionary. Ie, right-wing and therefore anti-radical.
Come on libs, tell me... is this really so hard to get?
Radical politics denotes the intent to transform or replace the fundamental principles of a society or political system, often through social change, structural change, revolution or radical reform.[1] The process of adopting radical views is termed radicalisation.
The word radical derives from the Latin radix ("root") and Late Latin rādīcālis ("of or pertaining to the root, radical"). Historically, political use of the term referred exclusively to a form of progressive electoral reformism, known as Radicalism, that had developed in Europe during the 18th and 19th centuries. **However, the denotation has changed since its 18th century coinage to comprehend the entire political spectrum, **though retaining the connotation of "change at the root".[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_politics
Seems like the word fits for his politics.
Did you actually read any of that before you posted it, lib?
Read this part here real slow like.
Radical politics denotes the intent to transform or replace the fundamental principles of a society
Pray tell... show me a white supremacist that wants to transform or replace white supremacism?
Should be pretty easy for a big-brained liberal like you to accomplish, shouldn't it?
Seems like the word fits for his politics.
So again... why is something so decidedly simple proving so damn difficult for liberals to understand?
If you believe that white supremacy is a fundamental principle of society then I suppose that yes, such a person would not have been "radicalized" from that perspective.
If you believe that white supremacy is a fundamental principle of society
And wtf did you think white supremacism is, genius? What did you think makes (so-called) "western civilization" western?
"Western" civilization is fundamentally white supremacist and always has been. What the hell did you think these white supremacists are trying to protect?
People are quick to paint the far-right as insane or stupid - but, in truth, they are far less naive about the world they exist in than their just-plain-right liberal cousins.
Suck on an unwashed sock, you puppet.
Oh look... a white supremacist has shown up.
No, I'm just not an anti-west moron. I'm also a communist, you slime.
I’m also a communist
Tell me another one, white supremacist.
Whelp. The inbreeding has gotten this one. Sit down before you pop an embolism.
I just love how libs show their true right-wing colors as soon as you start poking holes in their holy cows.
Do tell, lib... did you also not know what the term "western" is a dog-whistle for?
It's just so sad watching you try to put together a full thought. It just sort of sounds like fart noises and diarrhea plopping out of your mouth.
Hey - if I stop by do you think your wifesistermother would give me a handy? It probably wouldn't be a bad idea for your family tree to get some new blood after this many generations. Does she have more fingers than teeth? If so, maybe we can get into the weird shit.
so that's either a "no" or a "I know but pretend not to."
So all that is left to discern now is what kind of white supremacist you are.
What? Are you still going on about that?
Nothing you were saying really merits any attention. You're just using pedantry to project your shit onto other people. You're presupposing people arguments, then semantically twisting their words to be what you want. You didn't come here to discuss in good faith, you came here to vomit your narcissistic and infantile verbal diarrhea on the rest of us.
I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in whether your toothless wifesistermother is interested in tossing my salad. You're welcome to start calling me Daddy now because I'm probably gonna give you a little brother. Maybe with a new branch on the family tree, he'll be smart enough to avoid Infowars unlike his brotheruncle, but I doubt it.
I followed your reasoning back to it's origin and agreed that your premise leads to your conclusion. Not sure why that warranted sarcasm and insult.