Bulletins and News Discussion for February 19th to February 25th, 2023 - The Shadow of Suharto - COTW: Indonesia
Image is of Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia and the fastest sinking city in the world. A new capital is being built elsewhere in Indonesia.
I was going to make Indonesia the COTW anyway (unless something really massive happened somewhere else) due to the elections that might really designate the end of an era in Indonesian politics. Michael Roberts wrote up a big piece on Indonesia about a week ago, one day before the election began, so a lot of this information is coming from him.
Indonesia has been ruled by President Joko Widodo for 10 years, but is now barred from a third term constitutionally. Under his presidency, the Indonesian economy has seen fairly good GDP growth overall - about 5% per year, or an average of 4% per capita - and is broadly popular with the electorate. The biggest problems are the common ones, such as a lack of jobs and a high cost of living. Widodo's successors have naturally promised more jobs and an economic plan that clearly draws at least some inspiration from China's rise from the periphery to the heights of the world economy and manufacturing, but this seems pretty unlikely for Indonesia because, well, Indonesia is ruled by capitalist bourgeoisie parties and China is not. Indonesia's main gigs are palm oil, nickel ore, and oil, with internal manufacturing of these primary commodities only slowly growing and reliant on foreign labour.
Indonesia has a rather big employment problem. On the face of it, things don't seem bad, with an unemployment rate of only 5% - but this is only because it counts anybody who works even a couple hours per week. 60% of the workers in Indonesia are in the informal sector, with no real labour rights, sick pay, or guaranteed wages. And half of the ~8 million unemployed are young people. Indonesia is the sixth most unequal country on the planet, with at least 36% of the population in poverty, and the four richest men own as much as the bottom 100 million. This was a natural consequence of the policies of the dictator Suharto, who came to power in a coup overthrowing the communist nationalist leader Sukarno and killing one million communists, a period covered by Bevin's The Jakarta Method. At a fundamental level, not that much has changed since Suharto, and the country seems doomed to a path of slowing economic growth and massive amounts of environmental degradation under a plundering elite who will presumably fly off to New Zealand with the rest of them once the seas swallow the country, unless a communist movement can be rebuilt from ashes and can learn the lessons of 1965-66.
Though results have yet to be officially announced, it seems that 72-year-old Prabowo Subianto is overwhelmingly likely to have handily won the election. Once banned from the United States for human rights violations - a truly phenomenal feat - he has been the Minister of Defense since 2019, was an army lieutenant under Suharto and was his son-in-law. While this is obviously a particularly bad outcome, none of the other candidates seemed likely to fundamentally alter the trajectory of Indonesia, so the game was rigged from the start.
The Country of the Week is Indonesia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
At one point I got to watch another video of John Mearsheimer talking about how China's present and Japan's past exist in parallel. His argument being that Imperial Japan was not acting irrationally when it declared war on the US. The japanese leadership was under no illusion that it would be an easy war, or that they had any but the slimmest chances of winning. They only perceived it as the only way out of the economic catastrophe that the US embargo imposed on them. The argument then continues as Mearsheimer claims that China must be somehow both assured and contained in such a way as to not cause another war in east asia.
Yet I feel that he's got it completely backwards. It is the US that perceives hegemony as the only means by which it's continues prosperity is ensured. And it is the US that has to be contained and assured in such a way as to prevent a larger war, as well as to put an end to the regional wars that it constantly triggers on a whim. It is the United States who has to realize that growing prosperity in places like China and american withdrawal from hegemony status does not actually impede american development in any way.
The China panic is so hollow and easy to knock over, whenever any libs or chuds start to do their normal sinophobic mantras you can easily disarm it by asking why is China so dangerous if they haven't attacked or invaded or unilaterally sanctioned anybody? They seem to mostly keep to themselves and just trade with people? Like they really aren't that threatening when you put into perspective how peaceful they have been for 50+ years
If they bring up Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet or Xinjiang I just say "internal chinese affair, not our business. Let's handle American issues"
Mearsheimer has a clear eye on global politics but you can never forget that he's coming from the first principles of "I want the USA to be the global hegemon"
I think the US is gonna keep militarizing itself. And that it won't be the number 2 on that front any time soon. As for economics, unless the US balkanizes it will never cease to be a great power. It's not like Britain, whose entire financial system depended on tax farming the shit out of India. The US is an 'empire' unto itself, it's relatively safe from Climate Change, and it's population is nothing to scoff at. It has all the financial and human resources to be a world class power, it has only failed to utilize them due to being high on their own supply. Plus the full spectrum dominance of media in the West means the US has ways to spin things around and pretend that it's still the dominant economic power.
The problem we have I think is that the US doesn't just want to be number 1. That's everyone in a position to get there. That's arguably China's ambition. The US is used to being a number 1 in such a way that it thoroughly outclasses everyone else to the point that regional powers don't exist. Britain at it's height wasn't that.
Right but I'm worried about a state of affairs where the US is unable to compete economically (and starts losing control of the narrative) but still has an advantage militarily and sees no other way to maintain hegemony than asserting military force more and more. Which seems like a path it's already on. If the US is losing to China on every axis of power except military, then it seems plausible that it'll do something incredibly dumb and start WWIII because that's its only chance of remaining top dog.