Trump: ‘I’m not an insurrectionist’
Trump: ‘I’m not an insurrectionist’
Former President Trump on Thursday denied that he is an insurrectionist after President Biden said it was “self-evident” Trump was one for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Ca…
You're viewing part of a thread.
I am not pretending any such thing.
This you?
And what he and his people rose up against was the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral win.
Zig-zagging sideways does not conflate to up.
Because if it’s wrong, Trump should be on the ballot in Colorado.
Is that what you are really worried about? A rich white supremacist trust-fund baby sicced a white lynch mob on people in the US in front of the world's cameras, got away with it scott-free and you think your problems only extends to said white supremacist trust-fund baby ending up in the Waffle House again?
I'd say you might want to start worrying about the factors that enabled him to be there in the first place.
You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong. It's sort of looking like you aren't able to. I'm guessing it's because you aren't a legal expert.
He's zig-zagging his way there.
I will be surprised if I get a response to that, to be honest.
Lol oh look, another zag
And all he has to do is explain why the Colorado supreme court was wrong. It's so weird that he keeps avoiding that despite being asked directly, isn't it? Surely he's a Constitutional legal scholar.
You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong.
Are you placing your trust in the same institutions that are trying to convict the people protesting Pig City on racketeering and terrorism charges?
Or is your mind so thoroughly gouged by liberal brain-rot that fascism becomes perfectly acceptable to you as long as it's approved by the people "higher up" than you?
Do tell... are white lynch mobs technically illegal in the country that enshrines slavery in it's constitution?
You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling is wrong. "Other rulings were wrong" doesn't explain while this ruling is wrong.
Again, I think the answer is you aren't a legal expert despite acting like you are.
Are you trusting the same gas(oxygen) that caused an extinction event and is known to kill people when exposed to fire??
what are you? stupid?