Israeli army executes an elderly Palestinian after using him in propaganda campaign about its ‘safe corridor’ in Gaza
Israeli army executes an elderly Palestinian after using him in propaganda campaign about its ‘safe corridor’ in Gaza
Geneva – The Israeli army’s execution of an elderly Palestinian after using him in a propaganda campaign promoting its “safe corridor” in Gaza was strongly condemned in a statement released by Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor today.
The rights organisation expressed outrage over Israel’s incorporating the man into its attempt to cover up horrific crimes against displaced Palestinians fleeing Israeli violence in the northern Gaza Strip.
Israel’s army released a photo of one of its soldiers talking to Bashir Hajji, a 79-year-old resident of Gaza City's Zaytoun neighborhood, as he travelled on Salah al-Din Road, the main route to the southern Gaza Valley. The soldier in the photo appears to be helping and protecting displaced Palestinian civilians, said Euro-Med Monitor, yet Hajji was subjected to a field execution on the morning of Friday 10 November.
The elderly man’s granddaughter, Hala Hajji, told the Euro-Med Monitor team that her grandfather was brutally executed while crossing the “safe corridor” when members of the Israeli army intentionally shot him in the head and back. She also confirmed that he is in the photo that was put out by Israel—exposing the Israeli army's dangerous practice of flagrantly fabricating stories.
Euro-Med Monitor stated that it has previously documented dozens of cases where the Israeli army executed displaced Palestinians by live bullets and, in some cases, by artillery shells. Those displaced were attempting to flee to the south of Wadi Gaza at the Israeli army’s request.
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor renewed its calls for the United Nations and the International Criminal Court to open an urgent independent investigation into the execution crimes to which displaced Palestinians have been and are still being subjected to, to hold those who ordered such crimes accountable, and to achieve justice for the victims.
You're viewing part of a thread.
I'm not offended, I just find it funny that you're insisting you aren't getting angry while getting angry.
Anyways, there is a big difference between doubting someone can be completely objective and not believing a word they say. You don't have to be objective to be correct. Though in this specific case, I see no reason to trust the author, since there are no credible sources.
I'm not angry, I'm annoyed because you're trying to be annoying. No need to gaslight on top of that.
That's not what you've said. I'll add more quotes if you need that evidenced to you. Similarly, you mean the thing that I said directly before that comment? Noo.... Pay attention, there's a reason I redirected you multiple multiple times to read the comments in which you are responding.
none: I mean they’re biased; that’s normal. The thing is: Does that bias get in the way of the factuality of their reporting? Given that they have a pretty long track record, there needs to be a source that proves they’re unreliable.
You: Idk and I don’t really care enough to research it, I just wanted to point out that that article makes it quite easy to find reasons for why they would be biased.
Jesus Christ as I've said before if you would just read you wouldn't be popping off on tangents that make no damn sense contextually.
Do I really need to repeat myself? What I said in the comment you referenced is completely correct. No, being biased does not necessarily mean you are wrong, as I also already explained. Though I don't really know what you're even trying to achieve here, since you are ignoring everything I say anyways.
I can imagine that someone disagreeing with one is annoying if one thinks their opinions are the objective truth. Unfortunately, that's not how it works.
The top quote is not you as much as you'd like to take credit for it, the bottom however very much is you. Yes, I'm ignoring you... Hilarious.
No, I mean you specifically are annoying as fuck, you intend to be so don't act surprised that the thing you're doing is your working.
The top quote is horseshit, so I wouldn't want to take credit for that anyways.
Ad hominem again... you realize that achieves nothing, right? You can try to insult me all you want, it just makes you look even more pathetic. Especially since you're not even pretending to talk about the actual topic any more.
How so.
Again the lady doth protest too much, you can't be upset for name calling when you started it dumb dumb.
I'm not talking about the conversation? I'm literally quoting the relevant comments back to you, get fucked troll.
Ps. You know upvotes are open on lemmy so upvoting your shitty comments isnt worth the effort bud.
I'm not upvoting my comments lmao, it does that automatically. I couldn't care less about upvotes - unlike you, apparently.
Have you considered a career in politics? You seem to be pretty good at avoiding questions and derailing convetsations, which seems to be all the rage with politicians everywhere.
And with the childish insults again. You should really stop making a fool of yourself.
This username isn't, no.
Have you? You've dodged this point so Manny times we might as well call you Santos.
Aww poor baby can dish it but can't take it, why is that not surprising? You make fun of the fact I'm slowly going paralyzed but pointing out you're about as annoying as an ingrown hair on my taint is totally worse. Boo hoo, fuck off bud.
I'm making fun of what now? I did not even know that. You are interpreting everything as a personal attack, that is the issue here.
You seem to think you are taking revenge of some kind by insulting me. Implying you think you are hurting my feelings or something. Sorry to have to tell you this, but it'll take a bit more to do that than some rabdom stranger's preschooler level insults.
Yeah sure. Then you've not been paying attention which is sorta my point. You don't care about the argument your just trying to be annoying, you've quite literally admitted to it already. I'm interpreting everything as an insult? You're the one fucking crying about it.
No, I'm fighting fire with fire, if you're going to be an annoying asshole that doesn't care about the argument, why exactly shouldn't I throw the same back at you?
Aww poor baby got his fee fees hurt but can't keep up, boo hoo. Fuck off crybaby, you've abandoned the argument entirely at this point and admitted you don't even know what it is about.