Republican Congresswoman Argues Against Aid For Afghan Women Because She ‘Couldn’t Seem to Find’ It In the Constitution
Republican Congresswoman Argues Against Aid For Afghan Women Because She ‘Couldn’t Seem to Find’ It In the Constitution
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) suggested on the House floor that because the phrase "humanitarian aid for women and children in Afghanistan" is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, such aid is unconstitutional.
You're viewing a single thread.
The Lunatic is in the house
Does she know the “pocket constitution” also doesn’t mention that a woman can vote, let alone get elected?
30 0 ReplyI think you're right about the "get elected" part, but isn't voting amended to the constitution?
6 0 ReplyThose libturd, commie, sisy amendments aren't part of my constitution.
11 0 ReplyOnly one that matters is the one that lets me own more weaponry than a South American guerilla group!
2 1 Reply