"Sexual anarchy": New House Speaker Mike Johnson showcases the incel-ization of the modern GOP
"Sexual anarchy": New House Speaker Mike Johnson showcases the incel-ization of the modern GOP
The Louisiana congressman's career has been centered around his bitter obsession with other people's sex lives
You're viewing a single thread.
If he really wants to go down this route, then perhaps he should call out Nick Fuentes over his desire to have a child bride first. Both shithead monsters can fuck off and die.
If I'm going to Hell, then I am sure as shit seeing these two assholes there. And I'm looking forward to accompanying them while we burn. Seriously, fuck them both.
No no no, you misunderstand. Fucking a child is perfectly fine as long as you marry your victim.
please, show me where NF said any such thing
lol you gave me a Google search
Right right but it's what's IN the Google search that's the point.
Bruh, just look at his username - if you're hoping he'll argue in good faith, you're in for a rough time..
I just asked dude to show me proof NF wants a "Child Bride"
I'm indifferent, if NF did, I'm not going to lose any sleep
and he didn't show me proof
Alright bud, I took the 0.5 sec to pull this from the Google search for you
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/nick-fuentes-admits-dream-wife-020000948.html
I'm sure you'll find some reason to ignore that source too though, despite the fact that it tells you that exactly where to find the interview where he says it and provides direct quotes about it
No, they'll just never reply
Nah. He doesn't seem the type that can resist continuing the troll lol
Either way though, I'm done with it - if he actually cares, the proof is right there, if he doesn't believe Yahoo News (which would be reasonable), he can check out the original interview, if he refuses to do that, then it's clear he's just concern trolling and can be safely ignored 🤷🏼♂️
I miss /u/AmputatorBot
why do you assume so negativity?
I can give it and take it, I'll admit your right
I don't give much benefit of the doubt to someone who cares enough about an issue to refute claims of a high profile figure being a pedophile, but doesn't care enough about truth to out even a tiny sliver of effort into looking into the issue yourself.
oh please, get over yourself.
I asked for proof, not my allegiance.
see, that wasn't hard
It really wasn't, which begs the question of why you couldn't take the couple of seconds to do it yourself? You care enough to contradict the claim, but not enough to click more than once to get the proof? And you wonder why everyone in this thread has such a low opinion of you lol
Reading comprehension clearly isn't their thing.
so lazy, either shut up or put up
man conservatives don't even know how to click a link in Google. how embarrassing for you.
not a conservative
How's trolling working out for you? Genuinely interested.
nice username