1y ago

British govt funded plan for censorship of factual NATO criticism

thegrayzone.com British govt funded plan for censorship of factual NATO criticism - The Grayzone

Leaked documents reveal a British intel contractor singled out The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal for online censorship, and seeks to redefine factual criticism of NATO as disinformation. This report was originally published at Jack Poulson’s All-Source Intelligence Fusion. Subscribe here. A leaked ...

UK Politics @feddit.uk

ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 @feddit.uk

1y ago

British govt funded plan for censorship of factual NATO criticism

thegrayzone.com /2023/10/03/british-government-censorship-nato/

6 0

StupIDPol: A based critique of essentialism @lemmy.basedcount.com

RobotToaster @mander.xyz

1y ago

British govt funded plan for censorship of factual NATO criticism

thegrayzone.com /2023/10/03/british-government-censorship-nato/

1 0

Europe @lemmygrad.ml

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @lemmygrad.ml

1y ago

British govt funded plan for censorship of factual NATO criticism

thegrayzone.com /2023/10/03/british-government-censorship-nato/

1 0

6 comments

GrayZone is a strongly pro-Putin source.
- The report itself looks pretty reliable FWIW
  
  Not really. Their sources explicitly talk about disinformation and information based on true info but misconstrued to mislead people into false or pro-Putin narratives. But this "report" continues to frame this as if they're trying to censor credible, unbiased and factual reporting, which is a claim their source does not support.
  
  Even ignoring that, the report serves to draw attention to the funding sources of those "combating disinformation."
  It's a conspicuous bunch.
  
  Western organisations seeking to protect the west fund those combatting disinformation from primarily Russian sources that harms the west. Not exactly a bombshell, is it?