Hot take: LLM technology is being purposefully framed as AI to avoid accountability
Which of the following sounds more reasonable?
I shouldn't have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.
We shouldn't have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.
By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that's blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.
And it has been the technical term used in academia since the 1950's. If anyone is surprised by this usage then they have not studied it, only watched movies.