‘Vibe coding’ using LLMs susceptible to most common security flaws
‘Vibe coding’ using LLMs susceptible to most common security flaws
www.scworld.com
‘Vibe coding’ using LLMs susceptible to most common security flaws
16 comments
-
Even classic coders doesn't automatically write safe and secure code.
-
That's the crux of it. People talk like most coders are some kind of know all security and best practices wise.
That's just a lie or virgin innocence.
Most coders are just keyboard monkeys, those are the replaceable ones.
-
Ah yes, as they gain experience and learn they’re still just keyboard monkeys. Guess we should go back and try to type up some Shakespeare eh?
-
LLMs have been improving at a much faster pace than a programmer gaining experience and learning.
Y'all are just burying your head in the sand.
-
Bogus comparison. Babies also gain skills and knowledge at a much higher rate than adults but they make poor software architects and are prone to being sick on hardware.
-
What? That doesn't make any sense. You must be a pRoGrAmMeR!1!!11
-
-
Maybe in pure technical experience. But to fully integrate the business logic, legacy logic, and new logic it’s going to take more than just LLMs (at least for now)
-
That's the part where there's a person doing the vibe coding. If that person is not completely ignorant, helps.
-
-
-
-
-
16 comments