Share and Enjoy!
Share and Enjoy!
(Go stick your head in a pig!)
Come to think of it, "share and enjoy" is exactly the way I would expect an AI-generated YouTube video to end.
133 comments
-
Ludd himself might have had some good ideas, the luddites were most famous for smashing shit with hammers. You’re not General Ludd, you're a brainless hammer weilder who is terrified of technology. You do not have some good ideas. You have fear
-
I never said I was "General Ludd." I thanked you for the compliment. You then said it was historical revisionism, the article I pasted. Then I pointed out that their own words said otherwise. Then you called me wilfully ignorant, at which point I pointed out refusing to believe their words would be the wilfully ignorant stance.
Incidentally, there's no actual evidence Ned Ludd existed. He was a symbol. So yes, I'm fully aware I'm a real person that exists, thank you.
Also, I'm not even sure what you think my ideas are. Are you under the bizarre impression that I'm one of the two people in the image I posted? Or are you talking about what I said about You Tube?
-
You're posting anti-ai bullshit. You clearly take an anti-ai stance. I called you a luddite, like in some random dickwad with a hammer and no brain, You have proven me right. You are an idiot and are about as intractable as a trump supporter. Please never say anything about ai again, the world will be better for you shutting the fuck up. Honestly I am not surprised this shit needs explaining to you but am annoyed that it does.
-
Still waiting to hear what you think my ideas are.
-
Well yeah, you don't know because you're not capable of thought. You think ai is badwrongfun because you have been told it is evil. That's it. That's your entire thought process. You may or may not regurgitate some bullshit easily debunked arguments but you didn't think of them either, you're just regurgitating hatred and fear of technology because you're an idiot.
Glad we got this cleared up. Now please, just shut the fuck up!
-
Huh. I thought it was bad because it was a massive ecological disaster. But then I'm not capable of thought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impacts_of_artificial_intelligence
Also, if I'm not capable of thought, I'm definitely not capable of understanding your request to shut the fuck up, sorry.
-
Yeah we need more renewables. That's not a criticism of the technology. Try again. Or better yet, don't.
-
Once again, it feels like I'm not the one who is being wilfully ignorant here since there is no possible way you read that entire article in the time it took you to respond to me.
Please explain how renewables will solve the water problem.
-
Better off leaving this guy to be a hateful idiot mate. He hasn't said one thing of substance in the entire argument with you. He hasnt answered any of your questions in his entire tirade of insults, he is being consistently ignorant and hypocritical.
Is it really worth your time.
Everyone here can see who is in the right. The up and downvotes paint that picture just fine.
-
-
Pointing out the inefficiency of a system is definitely a criticism of the technology, and a valid one at that.
Wow, you really got your head up your ass don't you?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
133 comments