ruh roh
ruh roh
305 comments
-
advertisers pay google when google tells them I watched an ad. not when I do it
-
Even if you were right (which you aren't, ads don't work like that) it would change the fact you're stealing.
Does lying to yourself makes you feel less guilty?
-
I'm not lying at all, and I won't be made to feel guilty for avoiding ads
-
Deep down you are kinda guilty already, don't ya? You know what you are doing is wrong and yelling and strangers makes it easier...
-
no. telling people spreading misinformation they're wrong is cathartic to me
-
Whatever you need to tell yourself. Thieves don't get far in life, so reconsider someday.
-
calling me names won't change the facts.
-
If you steal, it's not a name, it's a definition.
-
stealing has a specific definition. I'm not stealing.
-
Taking things or using resources without paying the expected price. So theft. Tsk Tsk.
-
I'm guessing you feel like a bit of a mug for paying your hard earned money to faceless mega wealthy corporation so you want to believe that people who skip the ads without needlessly paying Google are stealing.
Well, they're not. They're just skipping ads.
-
-
So stealing is defined (in some states) as taking property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. So you're incorrect and commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com might be breaking YouTube's terms and condition not the law, and it's not theft.
If Google were paying the content creators anything even remotely resembling the kind of income from advertisers the content earns, I might have a shred of sympathy for them losing a tiny bit of advertising revenue if some user watches a video without watching the same three ads they've seen ten times already that day.
You're spending a lot of time and effort defending one of the richest corporations in the world. It's weird.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
305 comments