3mo ago

Pim Tool is a moron

You're viewing a single thread.

122 comments

Wow, he's the guy in the Matt Bors comic:
- I had an argument with my neighbor a few months ago. He was dead serious that it's the Democrats' fault for making young men Nazis. His arguments were basically exactly what this comic is saying. If you tell someone that hating minorities is wrong, that just makes them hate even harder.
  
  If you tell someone that X is wrong, that just makes them X harder.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactance_(psychology)
  The use of more concrete, low-controlling language, and the restoration of freedom through the inclusion of a choice-emphasizing postscript, may offer the best solution to reducing ambiguity and reactance
  
  This concept has a name. Cool, thanks, TIL.
  
  Could you provide an example?
  
  There's lots. A pretty easy example:
  Person 1: I like my truck Person 2: I prefer my EV, trucks consume too much fuel.
  P1: trucks have to consume so much fuel because that's what makes them powerful P2: but most people don't need that much power, trucks are unnecessary.
  P1 (feeling attacked, goes into a defensive mentality): I need a truck and lots of other people do too. (Continued rationalizations of why trucks are necessary) P2 (unmoved in their opinion): I still don't think they're necessary for the average person.
  P1: (further rationalizations as to the everyday benefits of a truck) P2 (still unmoved in their opinion)
  P1 successfully convinced themselves of the benefits of owning a truck.
  This is will known to marketing too. Most vehicle advertising is not to get you to buy a (insert vehicle here), but instead, get those with (insert vehicle here) to be so proud of how great their car is, that they convince you to buy (insert vehicle here).
  
  Oh I meant of your alternative suggestion. I definitely know that exchange lol
  
  This is actually a very interesting psychological phenomenon. I'm no psychologist, but stretching what I learned from "how to win friends and influence people" to the extreme, directly opposing someone's viewpoint generally forces them to defend it. By defending it, they rationalize the reasons why they adhere to the idea, and thus end up convincing themselves of their belief.
  Your opposition literally only serves to force them to rationalize their belief, and deepen their belief in that thing.
  It's fascinating, but stupid. In my experience, the most intelligent people I've ever spoken to will always take opposition seriously, even if with a grain of salt. When struck with an opposing viewpoint, they usually inquire about it, asking the speaker to justify their position so they can understand why they came to this conclusion. The mildly intelligent will then use that justification to tear down the person's belief in that system. The highly intelligent will then ask questions that cause the speaker to question their own beliefs.
  But doing nothing more than asking specific and pointed questions about someone's beliefs, I have seen very intelligent and clever people, get others to convince themselves that they're wrong in what they believe.
  Long story short, your neighbor isn't wrong, but they're also not exactly correct. The character of a person, IMO, is not in what they believe in, but how they react to adversity. Whether that adversity is political, intellectual, physical, or emotional; how you deal with difficulty is the content of your character.
  If making people of color, LGBTQIA+ people, and women, equal, by granting them the same rights and freedoms as everyone else (including bodily autonomy, and the ability to live, vote, and marry who they wish), causes you to start to lean towards fascism, what do you think that says about your character?
  
  There's lot of these chuds on reddit nowadays
  
  You should have told them they shouldn't support preaching abstinence then. As if they think that logic traverses throughout situations as such, it means they are trying to teach preteens to have sex
  
  You're not understanding it vor even trying to take it serious. No wonder voters are running ax from you.
  If you constantly tell someone they are at fault for something because they are of a certain race, if you constantly deny them any of their achievements and say is because of privilege, if you constantly chastize them, don't take them serious and ridicule them when they talk about their problems, they aren't going to feel represented by and vote for you.
  Voting for Trump isn't a rational decision, it's a emotional one.
  You need to Figuren out where you went wrong so the elections became emotional instead oft rational.
  
  How do you reach out to people are who are addicted to faux-american outrage porn with a side helping of persecution fetish?
  
  preferably you'd not let it get this far.
  Or you can just cry around and watch the next batch of savable (saveable?) boys become radicalized.
  
  Remind me who they were running as VP again? Was it another cishet white guy? Also maybe you should be the one trying to understand privilege instead of projecting your own insecurities onto the word. Cool flags though bro.
  -signed, Another cishet white guy
  
  please, I am a green-liberal.
  But sure, go on and bitch around, being all cocky and passive aggressive about the problem instead of trying to fix it.
  I mean, just look at it: You're framing it in a way that a white cishet guy running for (vice-)president is a problem.
  You are making fun of a person advocating for the troubles of young white guys. When in literally the sentence before it you were framing a white vice president as a bad thing. And then you're wondering why they aren't voting for you.
  It is on the nose. Especially since I already typed it out for you in my comment.
  
  Tim Miller of the Bullwark was just so pissed off by the audacity of “White Guys for Harris”.
  When asked why, he would mumble something about White guys being for anything is bad and then he would hear how ridiculous that sounds and change the subject. I saw him do it a couple of times.
  
  If you constantly tell someone they are at fault for something because they are of a certain race, if you constantly deny them any of their achievements and say is because of privilege
  I see Trump voters and people who want an excuse for their behavior saying this has happened. I've not actually seen it happening beyond the odd anecdotal outlier. I've seen people choose to interpret things like white privilege and systemic racism as if that's what's being said, but it always seems very clear to me that it's not what is being said, it's how they react to folks suggesting they be more mindful of how they interact with others or less dismissive of the ongoing impacts of historical injustices.
  Signed, a white guy, who doesn't deny all the awful things perpetrated by other white guys in the US, nor feel personally responsible for those awful things, nor feel blamed for those awful things, despite also having struggles, no money in the bank, and plenty of my own personal challenges.
  It's hard for me to have a lot of sympathy for the folks willing to fuck shit up for all of us (including themselves) because they aren't willing to stop and actually consider what is being said instead of what they think is being said, or because being mindful of how they interact with the people around them is somehow just too much courtesy to ask for.
  And psst - fixing a lot of those things would help white folks too!
- Some people are just that daft. They change or adopt an entire worldview simply because of one pet peeve they have.
- Replace "trump people" with "white people", and you're getting closer to how people on the right feel.
  
  As a white person, I'd like to ask that you don't lump me in with them in any way, shape, or form.
  Thanks!
  
  I grew up in the Seattle area. It was not until I traveled to the East Coast and South that I saw how fucked up people were. Other side of the tracks and blacks not welcome was all real.
  
  Sounds like you ended up in the Bible belt.
  
  Sorry, you've been sharing a skin colour with Stalin, Hitler and Leopold II since before you were born.
  We're going to need 1 whipping per year of your life, for atonement.
- Sure. People that get bullied fight back, and of there's only one other team, and they're naive, that's where they'll go.
  Continuing the bullying doesn't help.
  
  The guy in the comic is not being bullied though, that's the whole point of the comic.
  
  Can you point out the bully in the comic you replied to? Or in OP?
  
  No, it's fairly reasonably placed. I just dislike it in general.

122 comments