Alright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading
Alright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading
You're viewing a single thread.
That graph is so misleading. Makes it look like almost all the users disappeared but the Y axis only covers a small range at the top.
140 7 ReplyThe full range is about 5.5%. So while it is misleading, a 5% drop in a graph that consistent isn't nothing. Something substantial absolutly changed
84 0 ReplyMaybe whole Instance that went offline.
32 0 ReplyThat's my guess to
12 1 Reply
Cool then it should be 5.5% of the visual space for it to not be misleading. But it’s represented much larger. And OP is (edit to sound less mean) not updating the post sooo…
I call shade
12 3 Reply
It's like 70k users.
34 0 ReplyExactly. Not the over a million that it looks like at a glance.
The user count isn't helpful anyway, active users is a much better measure.
26 1 Replytrue that
3 0 Reply
I captured the graph with the number after the decrease at the bottom right to try to show the number of lost users, but I see where you come from
12 1 ReplyIf you saw why people would criticise it then you’d… edit the post, recapture the graph with an accurate visual representation including the zero on the Y axis?
2 12 ReplyWell...
- that's how the website displayed the graph when I took that screenshot, I'm pretty sure you can't modify the axis
- I'm not on my computer at the moment, editing is the most I can do right now
- if you can capture the graph with 0 on the Y axis, please post it below and I'll update the picture
19 2 ReplyOr just inform the other adults to consult the axis for clarification.
7 1 ReplyIt's the only way to demonstrate the fall, of you did it at scale it would've even be noticeable.
7 1 Reply5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.
2 2 ReplyThere are people here who didn't even notice the axis and are confused. How do you expect everyone to notice a 5% drop lol.
3 0 ReplyWell if they didn't even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph...
My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.
1 0 ReplyMy point is that it is hardly visible and doesn't show the exact numbers properly. I prefer the current style of graph for showing sudden changes if the previous data points isn't that important in the context. But everyone has their preference I suppose.
1 0 Reply
Lies, damned lies and statistics.
10 0 Replyno it's not?
you can see the axes and op even mentions that it's a 5% drop
the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
8 6 ReplyI edited the title after their comment, it wasn't that clear at the beginning
11 0 ReplyIn my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.
8 2 Replythe graph is clearly just fitted to the data
That's the problem. It's heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.
5 0 Reply